Skip to content
FaceOff Technologies

DeepFraudGuard

Check whether photographs, documents and identity papers are real, edited or AI-generated. Upload a file through the web app or send it from your own systems, and it returns a clear verdict: authentic, suspicious or forged, backed by visual evidence and plain-language reasoning anyone can follow

DeepFraudGuard · workspaceFile received
Portrait panelNumber lineCode strip
submitted-document.jpgno markings
  1. Received
  2. Preparing
  3. Verifying
  4. Evidence
  5. Result

What is considered

  • Visual consistencywaiting
  • Quality patternswaiting
  • Signs of AIwaiting
  • File historywaiting
  • Content checkswaiting
  • Seen beforewaiting
Running

Interface simulation: an illustration of the workflow, not a live analysis

Product Walkthrough

Fraud ID Guard for identity documents

  1. Aadhaar

    One field re-set in the wrong font

    The submitted Aadhaar is flagged, and the check names the tell rather than only returning a score: one field has been re-typed in a font that does not match the rest of the card, and that mismatch is what marks the document as edited.

  2. PAN card

    Three edits on one PAN card

    Three alterations marked on a single card before it is even submitted: the name line, and two runs of the PAN alphanumeric sequence, each boxed where the check found it. The marked-up image is what goes forward for analysis.

  3. Cheque

    The MICR line and the signature

    The specialised system that handles cheques and alternative documents returns forgery detected. Two places carry the marks: the MICR line along the bottom edge, and the signature above it.

  4. Invoice

    Not one alteration, but several weak points

    The invoice comes back at high fraud risk, and the reading is cumulative rather than a single tell: digital markers left by how the file was produced, structural inconsistencies inside the document, and individual line items flagged where the check found them.

What it is

Image, document & identity verification

DeepFraudGuard

DeepFraudGuard helps organizations determine whether photographs, documents and identity records appear real, manipulated or artificially generated. It brings different forms of digital evidence together to identify suspicious alterations and present the findings in a clear, understandable way.

Users can submit files directly through the platform or connect verification with existing business workflows. The result is a straightforward authenticity assessment supported by visual findings and plain language explanations, helping teams investigate suspicious media and documents with greater clarity.

Because a forgery has to fool all of them together, none slips through on a single weak check.

Try it here

Check an image or a document here

Drop an image or a document here

JPG, PNG, WEBP or PDF up to 20 MB

The engine is chosen for you · 1 credit

1 credit per check

Run the same engines the API runs, on a file of your own, with every signal family shown.

10 / 10Free checks left

See credit terms

Preview of the output format. The signal scores and the verdict shown here are derived in the browser from the file’s name and size, not measured by the forensic engines, though the job flow, the engine routing and the corroboration rule are the real ones. Book a walkthrough to have files of your own run for real.

6 signal families are consulted on every file.

How it works

How DeepFraudGuard verifies an image, a document or an identity record

  1. 01

    Submit

    Upload an image or document through the web application or send it from an existing business workflow

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeFILE RECEIVEDFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language
  2. 02

    Prepare

    The submitted file is securely prepared for authenticity verification

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforePREPARED FOR REVIEWFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language
  3. 03

    Identify

    It recognizes the type of content and selects the appropriate verification process automatically

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeVERIFICATION PATH CHOSENFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language
  4. 04

    Analyse

    The file is examined for signs that may indicate AI generation, digital editing, document tampering or other suspicious inconsistencies

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeCHECKS RUNNINGFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language
  5. 05

    Assess

    The findings are brought together into a clear authenticity assessment

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeAREAS MARKEDFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language
  6. 06

    Explain

    Supporting visual evidence help reviewers understand why the result was reached

    Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeREPORT PREPAREDFINDINGS BROUGHT TOGETHERAUTHENTICITYForged: evidence detectedView evidence →Report previewASSESSMENTAuthentic, suspicious or forgedEVIDENCEThe areas of the file that raised concernEXPLANATIONWhat led to the assessment, in plain language

Product exclusiveness

What sets DeepFraudGuard apart

Multi-signal authenticity verification

Visual consistencyQuality patternsSigns of AIFile historyContent checksSeen beforeONE FILE

Interface simulation: an illustration of the workflow, not a live analysis

How it compares

How DeepFraudGuard compares with a basic checker and manual review

  • Checks photographs for AI generation or editing

    Basic checking tool
    Partly: One result only
    Manual review
    Partly: Depends on the reviewer
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Several findings together
  • Checks documents for tampering and forgery

    Basic checking tool
    No: Usually images only
    Manual review
    Yes: Possible but slow
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Images and documents
  • Verifies identity documents such as Aadhaar and PAN

    Basic checking tool
    No: Not covered
    Manual review
    Partly: Checked by hand
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Fraud ID Guard
  • Shows where a document may have been altered

    Basic checking tool
    No: Score only
    Manual review
    Partly: Written notes
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Suspicious areas highlighted
  • Explains the reasoning behind each assessment

    Basic checking tool
    No: Score only
    Manual review
    Partly: Varies by reviewer
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Evidence and reasoning
  • Helps reduce unnecessary fraud alerts

    Basic checking tool
    Partly: Inconsistent
    Manual review
    Partly: Open to human error
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Findings weighed together
  • Keeps pace as fraud methods change

    Basic checking tool
    Partly: Occasional updates
    Manual review
    No: Not built in
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Improves through review
  • Supports high volumes in business workflows

    Basic checking tool
    Partly: Inconsistent
    Manual review
    No: Limited by people
    DeepFraudGuard
    Yes: Built for integration

The architecture

Six families in, one verdict out

One rule stands between them, and two have to agree

What goes in

One submitted image or document

Directed automatically
  • Image verification
  • Document verification
  • Identity document verification
  • Visual consistency
  • Image quality patterns
  • Signs of AI generation
  • File history
  • Content plausibility
  • Previously seen content
Findings weighed together

One unusual finding is not treated as proof. A stronger conclusion is presented only when the supporting findings point the same way, which is what helps real documents avoid being flagged without cause.

Authentic · suspicious · forged
  • Supporting visual findingsAreas of the file that raised concern
  • Understandable reasoningWhat led to the assessment, in plain language

Use cases by sector

Where DeepFraudGuard is used across sectors

Banking and finance

Verify identity records and review submitted statements for signs of forgery during customer onboarding and account checks.

How the sector deploys it

Insurance

Examine claim photographs and supporting documents for signs of manipulation before a settlement is approved.

How the sector deploys it

Lending and fintech

Check income proofs, bank statements and identity records for signs of alteration as application volumes grow.

Government and public services

Confirm that submitted certificates and identity records appear genuine before approvals or benefits are granted.

How the sector deploys it

Legal and compliance

Assess whether documentary evidence appears authentic and retain the supporting findings for later review.

How the sector deploys it

E-commerce and marketplaces

Identify artificially generated or altered product and listing images before they reach buyers.

Deployment strategy

Submit, verify and review through the platform or your existing workflow

01 · Submit the file

Interface simulation: an illustration of the workflow, not a live analysis

Under the hood

Built for controlled fraud investigation workflows

How teams reach the platform, work through their cases, connect it to existing processes and keep access under their own control.

Flexible access
Use DeepFraudGuard directly through its secure web experience or connect authenticity verification with existing organizational systems.
Centralized review
Authorized users can submit content, review previous analyses, examine supporting evidence and retain reports within a consistent investigation workflow.
Business integration
Verification can be incorporated into onboarding, fraud review, claims, compliance and other digital processes where suspicious content needs to be examined at scale.
Administrative control
Organizations can manage appropriate access and operational oversight according to their internal verification requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepFraudGuard is designed to examine photographs, documents and supported identity records for signs of AI generation, digital manipulation, forgery or inconsistency. The appropriate verification process is selected according to the submitted content.

Book a technical walkthrough

45 minutes with a solutions engineer. No slide deck unless you ask for one.

We use this to schedule the call. It does not enter a marketing sequence.

Where it runs

Industries deploying DeepFraudGuard

Each sector page covers the threat model, the controls, and the regulators that apply.

Check an image, a document or an ID

Book a walkthrough and we will run your own files through the three engines, and show the evidence behind each verdict.